CATEGORIZE IT!
Please have
a look at the image below. It shows a girl waiting at the Millenium Bridge in
London.
How you would categorize it? A portrait, an architectural image, a street photo, something else?
How you would categorize it? A portrait, an architectural image, a street photo, something else?
The other photo
shows a fire-eater from Sri Lanka, shot analog in 1985. Does it fit into
Action, Travel, or maybe another category?
And here
now my third question: Do we shoot in categories? Or in other words, do we try
to take images that will fit in a category? If you look at all the photo
magazines and photo forums around
everything will be categorized. I won’t say it’s a bad thing, because otherwise
you end up in chaos, but will we change the way we take photographs. Do people
go out and try to shoot explicit for a category in a magazine, let’s say for a
contest? I guess they do as a lot of people can’t judge a picture because it doesn’t fit into a category! You may
say, there are also “themes” around, but these are just more detailed categories, nothing
else.
I came
across that when I wrote a note about a picture in PhotoPortale (www.photoportale.de), a forum I’m a
member of. I wrote about a portrait of an old lady and I stated that I like this
portrait study. I got the answer that this term (portrait study) for a picture
is new to him and it won’t fit into any category, because no one uses this “description”.
Coming from illustration every portrait, finished or unfinished, is a “portrait
study” for me, as it only shows a moment in time.
Maybe time to add a new category for portraits?
Please let
me know what you think about this theme. And enjoy the pictures.
Kommentare
Kommentar veröffentlichen